About Kent Cowgill
Articles filed under...
abs ab_ripper andylester arms back baggyshorts bestpractices biceps bike birthday blog bugs bus calculator cardio catalyst cgi chart chest chinups code cpan datamodel dbi doctor documentation exercise exhaustion fitness flattire flat_tire google gps heart_rate helmet history home houston html humor journal kate kenpo kenpo_x kettlebell knees lazy legs lisa lisanne maps math matthew michaelmckenna mom montreal motivation movie mysql oops orm P90X pain park patellar_tendonitis patrick pdf perl phb photos physical_therapy plyometrics poor_gait presentation procrastination progress pullups pushups pyramid rabbits racecondition rant refactor rest ribs ride route running shoulders situps slides sore spike sql statistics syntax test testing textile timex training triceps ups versioncontrol video vim vimrc walk warren work workouts yapc yapcna2007 yoga youtube

A R C H I V E S

(3)
(1)
(3)
(2)
(7)
(15)
(16)
(25)
(3)
(4)
(2)
(4)
(11)
(1)
(1)
(3)
(2)
(2)
(10)
(5)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(9)
(21)
(3)
(3)
(1)
(6)
(4)
(1)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)


    Is Kent Cowgill Online?
    View Kent Cowgill's profile on LinkedIn
    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Recent Entries...

    Re: Re: Yoga kicks my butt

    Chris @ 46: Tatyana @ 21 – at best its a stop gap measure...

    Re: Vibram FiveFingers FTW

    Hats off to whoever wrote this up and potesd it....

    Re: A little more detail on using a new model

    百度 [url=http://www.sina.com]sina[/url] ...

    Re: Catching up through week 7

    testing video ...

    Re: Porting a non-Moose object to Moose

    Wow, look what I found, greedy genius ...

    Re: Porting a non-Moose object to Moose

    Kevin, You're right, that does seem a little confusing. ...

    Re: Porting a non-Moose object to Moose

    Wait. I'm confused. Moose isn't the tool to reach for. So...

    Re: Porting a non-Moose object to Moose

    You should switch to MooseX::Types to declare your Typed and...

    Porting a non-Moose object to Moose

    I'm currently working with a lot of legacy code in an envi...

    Testing strategy for mocking code

    I keep finding myself using the following idiom for writing ...

    weblog | `web·lôg -läg |
    noun
    Another term for BLOG
    ORIGIN 1990s: from web in the sense [World Wide Web] and log in the sense [regular record of incidents.]
    blog | bläg |
    noun
    A web site on which an individual or group of users produces an ongoing narrative.
    ORIGIN a shortening of WEBLOG.

    Because I have to get it off my back

    Kent Cowgill

    I'm struggling with some major frustrations at my job.

    I recently learned of a workaround for a race condition that has been an annoyance for some of my coworkers for nearly a year. Pointing out the silliness to my manager was a bit fruitless - she quickly turned around and assigned the 'fix' to me.

    So I took a look at the code.

    It was a mess.

    At least 27 different files call this code, so to properly refactor the code, all of those files would have to be changed and tested.

    But there's no tests.

    There can't be tests6. Why? Because these files are a mishmash of perl and HTML in a custom templating system which are sucked in and evaluated 6 ways to sunday on every web request. Files include other files, variables are set in weird objects, namespaces are a giant jumble, etc. so forth and so on.

    And the people who originally wrote this code have left the company - my guess is in frustration. They were trying to rearchitect the code, but it was taking too long, and so were told to just hack it to make it work.

    But surprise, there were performance problems, because the dynamic data originated from flat files on the filesystem which were parsed multiple times per page request. And this custom template system is running under mod_perl - why not make some persistent data?

    So I'm writing an email to my boss, and struggling with whether to include the following:

    I don't think further code reviews for $WEBSITE are worthwhile, since we lack manpower to make any changes. Further, since we don't have any tools to perform at least unit if not functional tests, it's impossible to refactor existing code without being certain nothing was broken in the followup.

    Due to the lack of manpower and lack of morale in existing manpower, nearly every IT project will eventually fail abysmally and become completely unmaintainable and unscalable. $COMPANY will continue to struggle along and churn through developer after developer - assuming we are allowed to hire some more to replace the ones that have left in frustration.

    But I don't think I can do it.

    Would you?

    6 Actually, I've been trying to find free time to finish the Test:: suite I've been developing, which is currently capable of splitting the perl from the HTML, evaling the code in its own namespace, running Perl::Critic and Devel::Cover on the code and HTML::Lint on the HTML, but I'm having trouble with the recursive templating creating new variables in the existing namespaces. Also since I lost half of my team members (including the team leader), it's a little tough to find that free time.

    Related Photos: work

    Main Page | Login

    Do you want to buy me ? Find more gift ideas at my wishlist